|
|
The Montgomery Family
An historical
and photographic perspective

Benjamin Franklin by Mason
Chamberlin, 1762
Philadelphia Museum of Art
Cooling by Evaporation
TO JOHN LINING AT CHARLESTON,
SOUTH CAROLINA.
New York, 14 April, 1757.
Sir,
It is a long time since I had the pleasure of a line from
you ; and, indeed, the troubles of our country, with the
hurry of business I have been engaged in on that account,
have made me so bad a correspondent, that I ought not to
expect punctuality in others.
But, being about to embark for
England, I could not quit the continent without paying my
respects to you, and, at the same time, taking leave to
introduce to your acquaintance a gentleman of learning and
merit, Colonel Henry Bouquet, who does me the favor to
present you this letter, and with whom I am sure you will be
much pleased.
Professor Simpson, of Glasgow, lately communicated to me
some curious experiments of a physician of his acquaintance,
by which it appeared, that an extraordinary degree of cold,
even to freezing, might be produced by evaporation. I have
not had leisure to repeat and examine more than the first
and easiest of them, viz. Wet the ball of a thermometer by a
feather dipped in spirit of wine, which has been kept in the
same room, and has, of course, the same degree of heat or
cold. The mercury sinks presently three or four degrees, and
the quicker, if, during the evaporation, you blow on the
ball with bellows; a second wetting and blowing, when the
mercury is down, carries it yet lower. I think I did not get
it lower than five or six degrees from where it naturally
stood, which was, at that time, sixty. But it is said, that
a vessel of water being placed in another somewhat larger,
containing spirit, in such a manner that the vessel of water
is surrounded with the spirit, and both placed under the
receiver of an air-pump; on exhausting the air, the spirit,
evaporating, leaves such a degree of cold as to freeze the
water, though the thermometer, in the open air, stands many
degrees above the freezing point.
I know not how this phenomenon is to be accounted for; but
it gives me occasion to mention some loose notions relating
to heat and cold, which I have for some time entertained,
but not yet reduced into any form. Allowing common fire, as
well as electrical, to be a fluid capable of permeating
other bodies, and seeking an equilibrium, I imagine some
bodies are better fitted by nature to be conductors of that
fluid than others; and that, generally, those which are the
best conductors of the electrical fluid, are also the best
conductors of this; and e contra. Thus a body which is a
good conductor of fire readily receives it into its
substance, and conducts it through the whole to all the
parts, as metals and water do; and if two bodies, both good
conductors, one heated, the other in its common state, are
brought into contact with each other, the body which has
most fire readily communicates of it to that which had
least, and that which had least readily receives it, till an
equilibrium is produced. Thus, if you take a dollar between
your fingers with one hand, and a piece of wood, of the same
dimensions, with the other, and bring both at the same time
to the flame of a candle, you will find yourself obliged to
drop the dollar before you drop the wood, because it
conducts the heat of the candle sooner to your flesh. Thus,
if a silver tea-pot had a handle of the same metal, it would
conduct the heat from the water to the hand, and become too
hot to be used; we therefore give to a metal tea-pot a
handle of wood, which is not so good a conductor as metal.
But a china or stone tea-pot being in some degree of the
nature of glass, which is not a good conductor of heat, may
have a handle of the same stuff'. Thus, also, a damp moist
air shall make a man more sensible of cold, or chill him
more, than a dry air that is colder, because a moist air is
fitter to receive and conduct away the heat of his body.
This fluid, entering bodies
in great quantity first
expands them by separating their parts a little,
afterwards, by farther separating their parts, it
renders solids iluid, and at length dissipates their
parts in air. Take this fluid from melted lead, or
from water, the parts cohere again; the first grows
solid, the latter becomes ice; and this is sooner
done by the means of good conductors. Thus, if you
take, as I have done, a square bar of lead, four
inches long, and one inch thick, together with three
pieces of wood planed to the same dimensions, and
lay them, as in the margin, on a smooth board, fixed
so as not to be easily separated or moved, and pour
into the cavity they form, as much melted lead as
will fill it, you will see the melted lead chill,
and become firm, on the side next the leaden bar,
some time before it chills on the other three sides
in contact with the wooden bars, though, before the
lead was poured in, they might all be supposed to
have the same degree of heat or coldness, as they
had been exposed in the same room to the same air.
You will likewise observe, that the leaden bar, as
it has cooled the melted lead more than the wooden
bars have done, so it is itself more heated by the
melted lead. There is a certain quantity of this
fluid, called fire, in every living human body,
which fluid, being in due proportion, keeps the
parts of the flesh and blood at such a just distance
from each other, as that the flesh and nerves are
supple, and the blood fit for circulation. If part
of this due proportion of fire be conducted away, by
means of a contact with other bodies, as air, water,
or metals, the parts of our skin and flesh that come
into such contact first draw more near together than
is agreeable, and give that sensation which we call
cold; and if too much be conveyed away, the body
stiffens, the blood ceases to flow, and death
ensues. On the other hand, if too much of this fluid
be communicated to the flesh, the parts are
separated too far, and pain ensues, as when they are
separated by a pin or lancet. The sensation, that
the separation by fire occasions, we call heat, or
burning. My desk on which I now write, and the lock
of my desk, are both exposed to the same temperature
of the air, and have therefore the same degree of
heat or cold; yet if I lay my hand successively on
the wood and on the metal, the latter feels much the
coldest, not that it is really so, but, being a
better conductor, it more readily than the wood
takes away and draws into itself the fire that was
in my skin. Accordingly if I lay one hand, part on
the lock, and part on the wood, and, after it has
lain so some time, I feel both parts with my other
hand, I find the part that has been in contact with
the lock, very sensibly colder to the touch, than
the part that lay on the wood. How a living animal
obtains its quantity of this fluid, called fire, is
a curious question. I have shown, that some bodies
(as metals) have a power of attracting it stronger
than others; and I have sometimes suspected, that a
living body had some power of attracting out of the
air, or other bodies, the heat it wanted. Thus
metals hammered, or repeatedly bent, grow hot in the
bent or hammered part . But when I consider that
air, in contact with the body, cools it; that the
surrounding air is rather heated by its contact with
the body; that every breath of cooler air, drawn in,
carries oft' part of the body's heat when it passes
out again; that therefore there must be in the body
a fund for producing it, or otherwise the animal
would soon grow cold; I have been rather inclined to
think, that the fluid fire, as well as the
fluid car, is attracted by plants in their growth,
and becomes consolidated with the other materials of
which they are formed, and makes a great part of
their substance ; that, when they come to be
digested, and to suffer in the vessels a kind of
fermentation, part of the fire, as well as part of
the air, recovers its fluid, active state again, and
diffuses itself in the body digesting and separating
it; that the fire, so reproduced by digestion and
separation, continually leaving the body, its place
is supplied by fresh quantities, arising from the
continual separation; that whatever quickens the
motion of the fluids in an animal quickens the
separation, and reproduces more of the fire, as
exercise; that all the fire emitted by wood, and
other combustibles, when burning, existed in them
before, in a solid state, being only discovered when
separating; that some fossils, as sulphur, seacoal,
&c., contain a great deal of solid fire; and that,
in short, what escapes and is dissipated In the
burning of bodies, besides water and earth, is
generally the air and fire that before made parts of
the solid. Thus I imagine, that animal heat arises
by or from a kind of fermentation in the juices of
the body, in the same manner as heat arises in the
liquors preparing for distillation, wherein there is
a separation of the spirituous, from the watery and
earthy parts. And it is remarkable, that the liquor
in a distiller's vat, when in its highest and best
state of fermentation, as I have been informed, has
the same degree of heat with the human body, that
is, about 94 or 96.
Thus, as by a constant supply of fuel in a chimney,
you keep a warm room, so, by a constant supply of
food in the stomach, you keep a warm body; only,
where little exercise is used, the heat may possibly
be conducted away too fast; in which case such
materials are to be used for clothing and bedding,
against the effects of an immediate contact of the
air, as are, in themselves, bad conductors of heat,
and, consequently, prevent its being communicated
through their substance to the air. Hence what is
called warmth in wool, and its preference, on that
account, to linen; wool not being so good a
conductor; and hence all the natural coverings of
animals, to keep them warm, are such as retain and
confine the natural heat in the. body, by being bad
conductors, such as wool, hair, feathers, and the
silk by which the silk-worm, in its tender embryo
state, is first clothed. Clothing, thus considered,
does not make a man warm by giving warmth, but
by preventing the too quick dissipation of the heat
produced in his body, and so occasioning an
accumulation.
There is another curious
question I will just venture to touch upon, viz.
Whence arises the sudden extraordinary degree of
cold, perceptible on mixing some chemical liquors,
and even on mixing salt and snow, where the
composition appears colder than the coldest of the
ingredients ? I have never seen the chemical
mixtures made; but salt and snow I have often mixed
myself, and am fully satisfied that the composition
feels much colder to the touch, and lowers the
mercury in the thermometer more, than either
ingredient would do separately. I suppose, with
others, that cold is nothing more than the absence
of heat or fire. Now, if the quantity of fire before
contained or diffused in the snow and salt was
expelled in the uniting of the two matters, it must
be driven away either through the air or the vessel
containing them. If it is driven off through the
air, it must warm the air; and a thermometer held
over the mixture, without touching it, would
discover the heat, by the rising of the mercury, as
it must, and always does, in warm air.
This, indeed, I have not tried, but I should guess
it
VOL. VI. 27 R*
would rather be driven off
through the vessel, especially if the vessel be
metal, as being a better conductor than air; and so
one should find the basin warmer after such mixture.
But, on the contrary, the vessel grows cold, and
even water, in which the vessel is sometimes placed
for the experiment, freezes into hard ice on the
basin. Now I know not how to account for this,
otherwise than by supposing, that the composition is
a better conductor of fire than the ingredients
separately, and, like the lock compared with the
wood, has a stronger power of attracting fire, and
does accordingly attract it suddenly from the
fingers, or a thermometer put into it, from the
basin that contains it, and from the water in
contact with the outside of the basin; so that the
fingers have the sensation of extreme cold, by being
deprived of much of their natural fire; the
thermometer sinks, by having part of its fire drawn
out of the mercury; the basin grows colder to the
touch, as, by having its fire drawn into the
mixture, it is become more capable of drawing and
receiving it from the hand; and, through the basin,
the water loses its fire that kept it fluid ; so it
becomes ice. One would expect, that from all this
attracted acquisition of fire to the composition, it
should become warmer; and, in fact, the snow and
salt dissolve at the same time into water, without
freezing.
I am, Sir,
B. Franklin
To John Lining
Dear Sir, London,
June 17, 1758.
In a former letter I mentioned the experiment for
cooling bodies by evaporation, and that I had, by repeatedly wetting
the thermometer with common spirits, brought the mercury down five
or six degrees. Being lately at Cambridge,
and mentioning this in conversation with Dr. Hadley,
professor of chemistry there, he proposed repeating the experiments
with ether, instead of common spirits, as the ether is much quicker
in evaporation. We accordingly went to his chamber, where he had
both ether and a thermometer. By dipping first the ball of the
thermometer into the ether, it appeared that the ether was precisely
of the same temperament with the thermometer, which stood then at
65; for it made no alteration in the height of the little column of
mercury. But when the thermometer was taken out of the ether, and
the ether with which the ball was wet, began to evaporate, the
mercury sunk several degrees. The wetting was then repeated by a
feather that had been dipped into the ether, when the mercury sunk
still lower. We continued this operation, one of us wetting the
ball, and another of the company blowing on it with the bellows, to
quicken the evaporation, the mercury sinking all the time, till it
came down to 7, which is 25 degrees below the freezing point, when
we left off. -- Soon after it passed the freezing point, a thin coat
of ice began to cover the ball. Whether this was water collected and
condensed by the coldness of the ball, from the moisture in the air,
or from our breath; or whether the feather, when dipped into the
ether, might not sometimes go through it, and bring up some of the
water that was under it, I am not certain; perhaps all might
contribute. The ice continued increasing till we ended the
experiment, when it appeared near a quarter of an inch thick all
over the ball, with a number of small spicula, pointing outwards.
From this experiment one may see the possibility of freezing a man
to death on a warm summer's day, if he were to stand in a passage
thro' which the wind blew briskly, and to be wet frequently with
ether, a spirit that is more inflammable than brandy, or common
spirits of wine.
It is but within these few years, that the European philosophers
seem to have known this power in nature, of cooling bodies by
evaporation. But in the east they have long been acquainted with it.
A friend tells me, there is a passage in Bernier's
travels throughIndostan, written near one hundred years ago,
that mentions it as a practice (in travelling over dry desarts in
that hot climate) to carry water in flasks wrapt in wet woollen
cloths, and hung on the shady side of the camel, or carriage, but in
the free air; whereby, as the cloths gradually grow drier, the water
contained in the flasks is made cool. They have likewise a kind of
earthen pots, unglaz'd, which let the water gradually and slowly
ooze through their pores, so as to keep the outside a little wet,
notwithstanding the continual evaporation, which gives great
coldness to the vessel, and the water contained in it. Even our
common sailors seem to have had some notion of this property; for I
remember, that being at sea, when I was a youth, I observed one of
the sailors, during a calm in the night, often wetting his finger in
his mouth, and then holding it up in the air, to discover, as he
said, if the air had any motion, and from which side it came; and
this he expected to do, by finding one side of his finger grow
suddenly cold, and from that side he should look for the next wind;
which I then laughed at as a fancy.
May not several phaenomena, hitherto
unconsidered, or unaccounted for, be explained by this property?
During the hot Sunday at Philadelphia,
in June 1750,
when the thermometer was up at 100 in the shade, I sat in my chamber
without exercise, only reading or writing, with no other cloaths on
than a shirt, and a pair of long linen drawers, the windows all
open, and a brisk wind blowing through the house, the sweat ran off
the backs of my hands, and my shirt was often so wet, as to induce
me to call for dry ones to put on; in this situation, one might have
expected, that the natural heat of the body 96, added to the heat of
the air 100, should jointly have created or produced a much greater
degree of heat in the body; but the fact was, that my body never
grew so hot as the air that surrounded it, or the inanimate bodies
immers'd in the same air. For I remember well, that the desk, when I
laid my arm upon it; a chair, when I sat down in it; and a dry shirt
out of the drawer, when I put it on, all felt exceeding warm to me,
as if they had been warmed before a fire. And I suppose a dead body
would have acquired the temperature of the air, though a living one,
by continual sweating, and by the evaporation of that sweat, was
kept cold. -- May not this be a reason why our reapers inPensylvania,
working in the open field, in the clear hot sunshine common in our
harvest-time (* 1), find themselves well able to go through that
labour, without being much incommoded by the heat, while they
continue to sweat, and while they supply matter for keeping up that
sweat, by drinking frequently of a thin evaporable liquor, water
mixed with rum; but if the sweat stops, they drop, and sometimes die
suddenly, if a sweating is not again brought on by drinking that
liquor, or, as some rather chuse in that case, a kind of hot punch,
made with water, mixed with honey, and a considerable proportion of
vinegar? -- May there not be in negroes a quicker evaporation of the
perspirable matter from their skins and lungs, which, by cooling
them more, enables them to bear the sun's heat better than whites
do? (if that is a fact, as it is said to be; for the alledg'd
necessity of having negroes rather than whites, to work in the West-Indiafields,
is founded upon it) though the colour of their skins would otherwise
make them more sensible of the sun's heat, since black cloth heats
much sooner, and more, in the sun, than white cloth. I am persuaded,
from several instances happening within my knowledge, that they do
not bear cold weather so well as the whites; they will perish when
exposed to a less degree of it, and are more apt to have their limbs
frost-bitten; and may not this be from the same cause? Would not the
earth grow much hotter under the summer sun, if a constant
evaporation from its surface, greater as the sun shines stronger,
did not, by tending to cool it, balance, in some degree, the warmer
effects of the sun's rays? -- Is it not owing to the constant
evaporation from the surface of every leaf, that trees, though shone
on by the sun, are always, even the leaves themselves, cool to our
sense? at least much cooler than they would otherwise be? -- May it
not be owing to this, that fanning ourselves when warm, does really
cool us, though the air is itself warm that we drive with the fan
upon our faces; for the atmosphere round, and next to our bodies,
having imbibed as much of the perspired vapour as it can well
contain, receives no more, and the evaporation is therefore check'd
and retarded, till we drive away that atmosphere, and bring dryer
air in its place, that will receive the vapour, and thereby
facilitate and increase the evaporation? Certain it is, that mere
blowing of air on a dry body does not cool it, as any one may
satisfy himself, by blowing with a bellows on the dry ball of a
thermometer; the mercury will not fall; if it moves at all, it
rather rises, as being warmed by the friction of the air on its
surface? -- To these queries of imagination, I will only add one
practical observation; that wherever it is thought proper to give
ease, in cases of painful inflammation in the flesh, (as from
burnings, or the like) by cooling the part; linen cloths, wet with
spirit, and applied to the part inflamed, will produce the coolness
required, better than if wet with water, and will continue it
longer. For water, though cold when first applied, will soon acquire
warmth from the flesh, as it does not evaporate fast enough; but the
cloths wet with spirit, will continue cold as long as any spirit is
left to keep up the evaporation, the parts warmed escaping as soon
as they are warmed, and carrying off the heat with them.
I am, Sir, &c.;
(* 1) Pensylvania is
in about lat. 40, and the sun, of course, about 12 degrees higher,
and therefore much hotter than in England.
Their harvest is about the end of June,
or beginning of July,
when the sun is nearly at the highest.
- Both letters
from the Works of Benjamin Franklin by Jared Sparks, 1838.

Plaque on the
home of Dr. John Lining, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
Photo courtesy Michael Sean Nix, Feb 13, 2010
Dr. John Lining, a young
physician who immigrated to Charleston from Scotland in 1730, was
married to Sarah Hill in 1739. It is not known if the couple
actually set up housekeeping in the town house of the bride’s family
or not, but it is John Lining’s name that will forever be associated
with the house. Here’s why: About the time of his marriage, Dr.
Lining was frustrated by his inability to offer any medical remedy
for the terrible epidemics of smallpox, whooping cough, and yellow
fever which frequently swept through the colony with deadly
consequences for many sufferers. As a man interested in science, he
was convinced that a logical connection existed between South
Carolina’s semi-tropical weather and these bouts of dreaded disease.
Thus, he began to record scientific observations of the local
climate from a make-shift “laboratory” in the house at 106 Broad
Street. In particular, he was concerned with measuring the affects
of the elements on the human body. He shared his meticulous findings
through regular correspondence with a fellow scientist in
Philadelphia – the young Benjamin Franklin. Eventually, the
impressive weather observations he measured and recorded were
published in England. The studies appeared in the Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society (of London) in 1742-43. Dr.
Lining’s work at 106 Broad Street was one of the important steps
forward in the 18th century’s “Age of Reason” – contributing to the
growing body of knowledge that would eventually save countless lives
not only in Charleston but around the world. - from Preservation
Progress for the Preservation Society of Charleston, 2006
Home
©
waughfamily.ca All Rights Reserved |
|